RAKETA / CASE 01
YouTube for OnlyFans: $4,255.58 attributed to our links
We created YouTube channels for an OnlyFans creator from scratch and took on their full management. After roughly 4.5 months of work, we had results to share — and two lost channels. This case covers both.
The tracker attributes these earnings to our links. The screenshot uses All time, Earning Type: Net and Attribution Type: Double. This is not the team’s profit after all costs.
Where we started
I entered this niche through a client who turned out to be an OnlyFans creator. We created channels for her from scratch, started working around late May and were still working on the project when the original post was published.
The goal was to develop her presence on YouTube and bring viewers to her OnlyFans. We took responsibility for the full channel-management workflow.
What our team did
- Concept and ideas. Developed the channel concepts, came up with topics and coordinated with the creator.
- Filming preparation. Prepared briefs and agreed on the content with her.
- Editing and packaging. Edited videos and made thumbnails.
- Launch and management. Created and prepared the channels, published videos and replied to comments.
Our work continued beyond delivering an edited video: it covered the process from the initial idea through publication and audience interaction.
The OnlyFans results
The tracker attributed $4,255.58 in OnlyFans earnings to our YouTube links. The same report shows 3,950 clicks, 714 Fans and 80 Spenders. Its displayed conversion rate is 18.08%.
This covers links from all our YouTube channels, including those later banned. It is not limited to the two channels shown below.
The earnings screenshot does not display exact start and end dates. “Roughly 4.5 months” describes the project’s duration by the post update, not a verified date filter for this report. A zero Cost field does not mean the team incurred no production costs.
The YouTube results
We have screenshots of two active channels. Their selected date ranges differ, so their figures are shown separately.
| Metric | Channel 1 | Channel 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Report period | 25 Nov 2025–8 Oct 2026 | 13 Oct 2025–12 Oct 2026 |
| Views | 802,135 | 778,559 |
| Watch time | 11.7K hours | 4.9K hours |
| Subscriber change | +7K | +2.2K |
| YouTube revenue | $17.36 — Studio estimate | Not shown |
Hours and subscriber changes are rounded by the interface. The report date ranges extend beyond our engagement; these are selected-period totals, not a separate measurement of growth since late May. The $17.36 from YouTube is not included in the OnlyFans earnings.
View the screenshots: earnings and two YouTube channels
What went wrong
We used more explicit content on two channels. They quickly gained millions of views and several thousand subscribers combined, but both were then banned for sexualisation. Appeals were unsuccessful.
They brought traffic in the short term, and some viewers subscribed on OnlyFans. But we could not continue developing those channels. Their analytics are no longer available, so the table does not include exact figures for them.
Leaving this part out would make the case look more successful. But only on paper 🗿
What we learned
Getting views quickly and building a channel that can last are different challenges. The bans made us want to invest in the audience’s connection with the creator and a sustainable format, rather than repeatedly starting over.
Our next direction is to focus more on the creator’s interests and content she can publish consistently while following platform rules. This is a direction for future work, not a proven result of a new strategy.
This case describes one project. Earnings are linked to tracked referrals, but also depend on what happens with that audience on OnlyFans. We cannot promise the same figures for another creator.